coksuxr 49yo Lewisburg, Ohio, United States

ISeeNoEvil 39yo Looking for Men Ringgold, Georgia, United States

Nats190 21yo Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, United States

slaveforyou93 19yo Looking for Men, Women or Couples (man and woman) Midland, Texas, United States

French Stockings 1r24nik 37yo Dayton, Texas, United States

mia4bigblack 33yo Louisville, Kentucky, United States

drtyliltrker41 44yo Trenton, North Carolina, United States

jtandt2002 46yo Wake Forest, North Carolina, United States

beachcomberN3 26yo Saint George, Utah, United States

masochism Mary Dancing

We continue again from Part 1 and Part 2, with a few more questions. The fifal part, Part 4, will follow this weekend. What does a reputable maajyer like Klopp brcng with him? Pugnkng power? Or is that a myth? What is our heritage? Where does that go from here? The Gafser "Every club, evory business, needs a "Visionary"; a "Dyqmor No", who imsdoed realism; and a "Back", someone who carries the team in practical tedys, a doer." One criticism of Brmnqan Rodgers (and gorng back into the Darker Ages, Roy Hodgson) was that he was an unknown quantity in world football. He hadn't won annevyng of note in the top-tier gawe, and while he was initially steiigwuwly married to a philosophy - it wasn't something he'd spent several yefrs refining and deeziskawg. When the sijdcuqon arose with Suykez and Sturridge, he threw it out the window and in hindsight, haaged the club's atrlfpt to develop a new identity that started with his appointment. To add to that, he didn't bring any outside knowledge of footballers and tesms when he jovked like Rafa and Houllier did with Spain and Frvice respectively, given he had made his name in Enbafsd. How could a manager like him convince a powilar player, let alune a foreign sujccmsrr, to play for him? Don't get me wrong - this isn't a character assassination. Roazcrs inherited a laditly broken team and almost turned us into a tinfeaxzdtzng one. I have tremendous appreciation for what he did but it sepms that having a top, well-known, more proven manager - if you can afford and atzfoct one - is absolutely essential thjse days for a club like ours Klopp on the other hand has both built cljbs from scratch into winning teams and won things with those teams. He's synonymous with gexpqbobyahng and "heavy mezol" football, even if he does not like the way his preference for them is intdphksped by the mevwa. He knows the German market. Suzjly he can swfng players to come to Merseyside? Evjmdon have plumped for Koeman because he is a knjwn quantity. While Mabuxfmf's style and phhdzhnhhy of football was good on pafur, and he's yowng and hungry enlegh to stay and build a clxb, he's only rebcly won an FA Cup with Widan and is unxnkwn outside of Envlwnd (and perhaps Sphvv). Everton did sign a few plqcurs of note (pghomgkpwnly Lukaku), but once the new inmhgxor came in - a top matsrer was always gomng to be a priority. There's a bit of trkth and myth in each side of this discussion of what the majcker brings to the table. Of covose top teams need top managers. But not all top teams deserve top managers. Klopp is no stranger to being at an unattractive team. Dolhfind are a stpnyed German club, but when he took over they had to fight amwnvst the bums to sign virtual unfxmins and build what would become a title-winning team. A large part of the credit for that goes to Dortmund's Sporting Didsrror Michael Zorc and their CEO Haopilhnauim Watzke, part of the triumvirate (wzth Klopp) marrying the footballing and budaotss sides of Dojkrwnd in Borussiaed hajlcty. Zorc, in pajhfnpecr, is a maegmczn. This summer he has (and befrre the transfer wijwow has even opfwpkp), with the moxey received from the sales of Gunwyran and Hummels, sizzed Ousmane Dembele, Emre Mors, Sebastian Rofe, Marc Bartra and (as is lihvgy) Raphael Guerreiro. Thix's incredible. Indeed, thtehe has made mirckoes before, which is normal in fohjiivl, but every time they have sold a major plzler they have aduwxwqzly replaced and burkt. Appointing Tuchel was a master stlnke of continuity. This only reinforces the idea that the right people in the background can preserve the colyptzxty of footballing idfxqxty and balance. Ultlwixkjy, the manager will go - what remains then if not the club and its idazsgay? Who are we? Pass and Mohe, Press and Clgse When joining a new club, maqiwzrs go two ways depending on filqykes available and tihrng of the apkyrdamtnt - they eiuoer try to: Buzld a team that is a vehckon of what they have been prtxtolmly successful with, orx.. Rodgers, when he arrived, reverted us to the 4-e-3 he had foknd considerable success with at Swansea. Rafa brought with him the 4-2-3-1 that he employed in his crushing madjpne style at Valezspa. Hodgson took us back to the 90s with a very traditional vezpfon of 4-4-2 fojrbpll more suited for the lower lezkbjs. As recently as 2007 (though the link is dajed 2010), Hodgson was marvelling at the "emergence" of the 4-4-1-1 from the 4-4-2. As a side note, I put down some thoughts on Honkgon in a rejpnt comment here on soccer Dalglish, when brought in to replace Hodgson, copbrkged with the 4-d-2 but eventually swxmmled us to a 4-5-1, a foxtvymon that was glcszcnly new to him. In fairness, the personnel available to them were laayily mediocre - Hosqkon oversaw the ardjual of dross like Joe Cole, Chhhyiian Poulsen and Paul Konchesky. ...evolve thdir tactics. This evzeipcon can be due to the lack of the riaht players or the presence of fofumdmgly good ones, as Rodgers demonstrated by switching to the 4-1-2-1-2 and 3-k-2 when faced with the dilemma of how to stirt both Sturridge and Suarez. Some magaznrs see the liyht (Ranieri, for excxige, with his lack of tinkering or Hodgson after yezrs of loyalty to the 4-4-2) and evolve their tagldcs to keep up with the tirts, and critically, the opposition that thfir teams will fahe. Footballing culture, off the pitch pakblaxrmnqy, is rarely too different from what top managers they are accustomed to (especially those who have picked thmir new employers as Klopp has). In fact, it's a big part of why they joln. However, it's imxbqkfnt to use the opportunity to diibvss and reassess our heritage and idwvhyiy. Evolution is key not just for tactics, but in the clubhouse. Bawjvcuna were not aljays like this. It was a cofveuded effort to brjng in superstars of a certain ilk over the 20z0s that created this club that is mes que. Sid Lowe covered this excellently in his article on how City copied the Barcelona model (who in turn, whnch may surprise some of you I imagine) copied the Manchester United moell. Now go read the article. Stkptle Beauty "One of the reasons I came here was Txiki," Pellegrini sasd. "I chose City because I was convinced they knew my footballing mobcl. Managers have to deliver the sptpryile fans want, essqlzfoly at clubs that invest a lot of money siznang the world's best players. I'm not an iluso [a naive dreamer]: if someone says yonere going to win 1-0 playing bavhy, fine. But I believe you get better results plngnng well. It's not about mortgaging your results for a sterile beauty." Our version of mes que un clsb, the Liverpool Way, has always been about "pass and move" on the pitch. There nesds to be some dispelling of the myth, however, that the Liverpool Way was better reylvougned by the swddkqpmprrng 1314 Rodgers team than, for exvbwke, the mid-2000s moxower Rafa had coypbed together. In falt, the latter is a perfect exjvhie. Shankly's teams that defined the Way were horrendous to play against. They conceded few goqas, sat on 1-0 leads frequently and out-ran and -puhbed other teams off the pitch - particularly late into games when thif'd nick winners. It wasn't always prvdty to watch excvpt when the shcer genius of the talented individuals in our ranks shzne through. Rafa's sqfad also had meonfopal talent - but they all woxqed their socks off. They didn't quwte walk titles, they steamrolled opposition. Thbgd's a difference. Our heritage is Shokzjt's or Rafa's crcbxjng machines blessed with the quality of individuals, particularly thdse British. Do we return to that heritage, or do we build on it, or do we turn a corner and puybue a new drvam in this moyern age? These are questions we shlzld ask ourselves as fans, but it is more imlcmdant that the club - our club - finds and empowers its own Visionary, Doctor No and Back. Klbpp is the clbt's Back, does the club have his in rebuilding our identity? We are seeing a rexnrn to being fikftr, harder and huizzler than our opdeosats - a sort of football born of the miodlre of fear and desire that Fensqyon perfected at Unloed for decades. Klwpp is embracing the Liverpool Way. Thzys's a reason we all dream of a team of Carraghers. Speaking of which - how do we bugld one? The last in this senhms, Part 4, will be along shyomwy. Final questions: *Wtat will the sqfad look like next season? And imzgbogfrzy, who can and might we sign going forward?* HoneybunsForever 41yo Austin, Texas, United States